A New Leaf
Having seen WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS, starring Cameron Diaz and Ashton Kutcher, this writer is reminded of the reason why movies, even those delighting in debauchery, are paramount to our understanding of life. What we yearn for is to be witnesses of change, the fundamental principle behind any admirable flick and a remedy paramount to success, whether of our life or that of on-screen image. Without change, there would be no life - because for growth to occur there must be change. For life to exist, you could say, there must be a death. If characters in movies didnot change they would be flat and mundane and very unappealing. It is the quintessential aspect of any story for the protagonist to wind up in a more admirable position at the end than when we were first introduced to him - or her.
The plot of this movie is not that simple: for an quick overview you can read about it here. The two main characters are Joy McNally and Jack Fuller, desparate for a change of circumstances in their lives following a fall-out in their most important relationships, Joy with her fiance' and Jack with his dad. What they seek is what we often seek when we consider a need for change: this would be change of circumstances and not a change of behaviour. Heading off from New York, both Joy and Jack wind up in 'Vegas in the false hopes of finding that change - but come to realize in the end that change is closer to home. Welcoming change is not bad, when we go from one level of circumstances to a more pleasing one, or where a dream is realized, or better yet, a goal accomplished. Truly, it is the journey along the way and the noticeable change in one's outlook, behaviour and character that manifests the results which are more pleasing in the long run and very admirable. If Jack Fuller didnot change at the end of this movie but remained the same irresponsible "bachelor-type" of person as he is in the beginning, where would be the interest?
The movie WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS is not a bad show at all. Except for some occassional scenes where the excess of Vegas nightlife is gross and the writer of this movie thinks we really need to get spot shots of debauchery to understand how Diaz and Kutcher are "drawing near to each other", the premise of the movie and the change which each character exhibits at the end of the flick causes it to be seen as decent material. It is, of course, all about change. If both characters coming across the screen remain the same we would naturally tire of them, yet they, as Joy and Jack play roles of people unable to exhibit their true selves and desire for improvement, finding it only when each draws it out of the other. Joy wants to be valued by the opposite sex - that's her makeup - a man who values her zest, her party spirit but feels compelled to find it only in the security of a successful person like herself. She's no bum. Kutcher - who can't act, by the way - as Jack is that type of guy who finds it hard to stick with something because it impedes on his hip, gung-ho personality. Constancy eludes him. He's not looking for the challenge to change, but in fact wishes to remain the way he is, to which he would respond: "How much do you want to bet I can change?"
The human condition seeks change, albeit a "change of address", to live in a new set of surroundings. Places like Vegas seem to offer that, where turning a blind eye momentarily to morality and conscience is the hip thing to do. Everybody needs a 'Vegas; what matters, though, is a change of being, as this story shows. We are a very big consumers in this nation of books and movies and we delight in tales showing the lead character coming to terms with a poor situation and in the end, himself turning out to be a better person. Yet, for us the viewer, change comes too slowly and is not nearly as fun or worse - it's looked upon in the wrong light.We only wish to go from an 'inferior" position to a "superior" one and, no longer being on the bottom, where we presume we are, or in the middle - where we can begin and end - our yearning is for the opportunity to dictate how things should be, in our mind's eye. Take Jack Fuller as an example: prior to winning the three million dollars he was unemployed and broke. Don't ask how he got to Vegas - but winning several million dollars would surely change any person's circumstances. The gist of the movie is the change in his behaviour that follows, which makes his character more appealing. How, then, do we affect change in our own lives?
To change requires two things: increase in understanding, thereby becoming a better person, and also make the sacrifice that makes the hidden portion of you to grow. For every investment made, we expect a profit. This is a universal explanation of why we are attracted to the things that show a change: to make better on top of what we have - or to become better on top of what we are. In addition, no change can occur unless there is a sacrifice - the sacrifice of ourselves. Jack Fuller must give up his attraction to the easy life, where his dad provides for him and no matter what, he'll always have something to fall back on. By winning the three million dollars you could say he had something to build upon - and better do such! Joy has the more difficult task - she must give up pursuing what is not good for her, and that is money - or rather the person who has it, and instead focus on enriching the life of the man who values her.
It's obvious that what happens in Vegas doesn't stay there; that's only because Vegas, deep down inside, doesn't change. It's baudiness and fantasy "no cost", emotive changrilas remain the same. Not a bad place to grow up, though; people there seem to have good family and moral values. Perhaps that's what we should take with us when we happen to be there - if we find a change in our behanvior too demanding.